Cases 1 - 8 of 8
METELLUS v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 5:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
MOISE METELLUS
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC , WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
COPELAN et al v. ELITE LENDING PARTNERS et al
as 5:2012cv00310
Plaintiff:
WILLIE DAVID COPELAN and CLARA I COPELAN
Defendant:
ELITE LENDING PARTNERS and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
WYLIE et al v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY et al
as 5:2012cv00308
Plaintiff:
ROBERT V WYLIE and ROBBIE J HICKS-WYLIE
Defendant:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
HENRY v. CALUSA INVESTMENTS LLC et al
as 5:2012cv00309
Plaintiff:
GEORGE W HENRY
Defendant:
CALUSA INVESTMENTS LLC, HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES INC and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
FAULCONER v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC et al
as 5:2012cv00246
Plaintiff:
NANCY FAULCONER
Defendant:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC , HOME AMERICA MORTGAGE INC , US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
NESBITT v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION INC et al
as 5:2011cv00476
Plaintiff:
ESTHER NESBITT
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION INC and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Citibank NA et al v. ARNOLD
as 3:2011cv00155
Plaintiff:
Citibank NA , PENNY MAC LOAN SERVICES LLC , MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC and others
Defendant:
KELLY D ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Johnson v. GMAC Mortgage et al
as 5:2010cv00367
Plaintiff:
Toni A Johnson
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage, American Residential Mortgage Corporation and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
