Cases 1 - 9 of 9
POWELL v. WEST CLUB LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00392
Defendant:
AGPM SERVICES LLC, WEST CLUB LLC, TARENE LANCASTER and others
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL et al v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 5:2020cv00119
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
EMMA POWELL and RICHARD W POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00202
Plaintiff:
JD POWELL, JR
Defendant:
JACK RANDALL SAULS, TREVONZA BOBBITT, WILLIAM CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Samsonite Co. Stores, LLC et al
as 7:2016cv00125
Plaintiff:
TERRELL CHASE POWELL
Defendant:
SAMSONITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES INC et al
as 3:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
JACKIE C POWELL
Defendant:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES INC , WAL-MART TRANSPORTATION LLC , WAL-MART STORES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
POWELL et al v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
as 4:2013cv00454
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH POWELL and THOMAS POWELL
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell et al v. Mentor Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv00319
Defendant:
MENTOR CORPORATION and MENTOR WORLDWIDE
Plaintiff:
CELESTE POWELL and PHILLIP POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Powell v. Geekie et al
as 5:2009cv00189
Plaintiff:
Michael J Powell
Defendant:
Aryn Grayel Gordon Geekie, North American Midway Entertainment - Canada Holding Inc and Canadian Midway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Powell v. Geekie et al
as 5:2009cv00188
Plaintiff:
Kim M Powell
Defendant:
Aryn Grayel Gordon Geekie, North American Midway Entertainment - Canada Holding Inc and Canadian Midway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
