Cases 1 - 8 of 8
JAMES v. LINDQUIST et al
as 7:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
BRUCE JAMES
Defendant:
BEN LINDQUIST, SILVIS, AMBROSE, LINDQUIST, COCH P.C., THOMASVILLE BRANCSHARE D/B/A THOMASVILLE NATIONAL BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
DOE 1 et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1, JANE DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
CLEVELAND v. MACON MEMORIAL PARK et al
as 5:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
CARLA CLEVELAND
Defendant:
MACON MEMORIAL PARK doing business as MACON MEMORIAL PARK CEMETERY #06232, SCI SHARED SERVICES INC and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JOHNSON v. ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION et al
as 5:2020cv00402
Defendant:
H&CS Services, LLC d/b/a Community Ambulance, John and Janes Does, Zoll Medical Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Johnson and Carol Johnson, as administrator of the Estate and Surviving Spouse of Edward Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIGHTOWER v. RESCARE HOME CARE SERVICES GEORGIA LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00358
Plaintiff:
WYLENE HIGHTOWER
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES 1-10, JENNIFER P HILL, RESCARE HOME CARE SERVICES GEORGIA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURTON v. PHOEBE PUTNEY HEALTH SYSTEM INC et al
as 1:2020cv00029
Defendant:
JACK D OWENS, MD, PHOEBE PUTNEY HEALTH SYSTEM INC, PHOEBE SUMTER MEDICAL CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
KYDAISHA BURTON and KESHAWN CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JAMES v. GROSS et al
as 5:2019cv00349
Defendant:
LAWRENCE GROSS, BP EXPRESS, INC., JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-30 and others
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARNER v. LUNDBERG, et al.
as 4:2017cv00182
Defendant:
Audrey G. Marshall Lundberg , Elizabeth A. George , John/Jane Does 1-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Atiya D. Garner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
