Cases 11 - 20 of 26
KING v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2012cv00180
Plaintiff:
PRISCILLA HALEY KING
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty
Hodges v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2012cv00150
Plaintiff:
Levi-Kenneth Hodges
Defendant:
United States of America Internal Revenue Service and KELLY TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00025
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1553
United States of America Internal Revenue Service v. Odom
as 5:2010mc00021
Plaintiff:
United States of America Internal Revenue Service
Defendant:
Sam Odom
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00067
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Citifinancial Services, Inc. v. Ogletree et al
as 4:2010cv00039
Plaintiff:
Citifinancial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Mary J Ogletree, Tommy Ogletree, Terry Keith Valentine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00079
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Jackson v. United States Secret Service et al
as 5:2008mc00013
Plaintiff:
Michael T Jackson
Defendant:
United States Secret Service and Internal Revenue Service
Bandawat et al v. Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2008mc00007
Petitioner:
Steven J Bandawat and Patricia Bandawat
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
United States of America et al v. Johnson & Son Materials, Inc.
as 3:2008mc00001
Defendant:
Johnson & Son Materials, Inc.
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Internal Revenue Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
