Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Doe v. Deal et al
as 1:2015cv02226
Defendant:
Nathan Deal and Samuel S. Olens
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Deal et al
as 1:2015cv02069
Plaintiff:
Sherri Jefferson
Defendant:
Nathan Deal and Samuel S. Olens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of Georgia v. McCorley
as 1:2015cv01623
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia
Defendant:
Christian M. McCorley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Freedom Bail Bonding Co., Inc. v. Beam
as 3:2013cv00206
Plaintiff:
Freedom Bail Bonding Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Wendell Beam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Georgia State AFL-CIO, Truck Drivers & Helpers Local No. 728 et al v. Olens et al
as 1:2013cv03745
Plaintiff:
Georgia State AFL-CIO, Truck Drivers & Helpers Local No. 728 and United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 1996
Defendant:
Sam Olens and John Nathan Deal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delta Cab Association, Inc. et al v. City of Atlanta, Georgia
as 1:2013cv02218
Plaintiff:
Delta Cab Association, Inc. and Workeshet Cherinet Wmichael
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Georgia
Commoditas Georgia, LLC v. Deal et al
as 1:2013cv02131
Plaintiff:
Commoditas Georgia, LLC
Defendant:
Nathan Deal and Samuel S. Olens
Amicu:
Georgia Amusement and Music Operators of Georgia, Inc.
Georgia United Credit Union v. Crespo et al
as 2:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Georgia United Credit Union
Defendant:
Carey Crespo and Beverly Crespo
Counter_claimant:
Carey Crespo and Beverly Crespo
Counter_defendant:
Georgia United Credit Union
Berry College, Inc. v. Rhoda et al
as 4:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
Berry College, Inc.
Defendant:
Richard G. Rhoda and Stephanie Bellard Chase
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CTIA - The Wireless Association v. Echols et al
as 1:2013cv00399
Plaintiff:
CTIA - The Wireless Association
Defendant:
Tim G. Echols, Charles M. Eaton, Jr., Herman Douglas Everett and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
