Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 91 - 100 of 169
Nguyen v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00109
Petitioner: Hoang Nguyen
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garza v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00067
Petitioner: Carlos Garza
Respondent: United States of America
Padillo v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00014
Petitioner: Adolfo Padillo
Respondent: United States of America
Cervantes-Zuniga v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00030
Petitioner: Emilio Cervantes-Zuniga
Respondent: United States of America
Wilson v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00029
Petitioner: Ricardo Wilson
Respondent: United States of America
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00004
Plaintiff: David Johnson
Defendant: United States of America
Gomez v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv03653
Petitioner: Victor Abiles Gomez
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cade v. Progressive Community Healthcare, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv03522
Plaintiff: Toxi E. Cade , United States of America and State of Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice
Defendant: Friendship Community Healthcare, Inc., Michael Brooks, Carisa Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Barajas v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv03459
Petitioner: Jose Magana Barajas
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carmichael v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv03370
Petitioner: Casey Austin Carmichael
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?