Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Ocala Inn Kash, Inc. et al
as 1:2013mi00180
Plaintiff:
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
Ocala Inn Kash, Inc. and Harish Pattni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Patel
as 1:2013mi00169
Plaintiff:
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
Devendra Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Patel
as 1:2013mi00055
Plaintiff:
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
Jay Kumar Patel
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Brunswick Innkash, Inc. et al
as 1:2012mi00082
Plaintiff:
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
Brunswick Innkash, Inc. and Harish Pattni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Neha Properties LLC et al
as 1:2012mi00007
Plaintiff:
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
Neha Properties LLC and Sandhya M. Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. v. Gold International, Inc. et al
as 1:2011mi00045
Plaintiff:
Days Inn Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
Gold International, Inc. and Yuhai Ma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. v. Brunswick Innkash, Inc. et al
as 1:2010mi00143
Plaintiff:
Days Inn Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
Brunswick Innkash, Inc. and Harish Pattni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Letap Hospitality, L.L.C. et al v. Days Inn Worldwide, Inc.
as 1:2010mi00113
Plaintiff:
Letap Hospitality, L.L.C. and Urvil Patel
Defendant:
Days Inn Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. v. Santosh, Inc. et al
as 1:2009mi00541
Plaintiff:
Days Inn Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
Santosh, Inc. and Tek Chand
Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. v. Gainesville Hotel Investors et al
as 1:2009mi00513
Plaintiff:
Days Inn Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
Gainesville Hotel Investors and Jay Kumar Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
