Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Morales v. Chase Home Finance, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01305
Plaintiff:
Claudia Morales
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC , JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Johnson & Freedman, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Bond
as 1:2011cv00658
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Frederick D. Bond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kumar v. Chase Home Finance LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00355
Plaintiff:
Kanchan Kumar
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance LLC and JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Carvajal v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 2:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Marta Carvajal
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexandra Park, LLC v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 1:2010cv03823
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Park, LLC
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Butticaz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv03222
Plaintiff:
Dale F. Butticaz
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and McCurdy & Candler LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. OKelley et al
as 1:2010cv02190
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Brenda OKelley, William R. Steffen and Fidelity Bank
Price et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2010cv01639
Plaintiff:
Jameca L. Price and Orlando R. Price
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. as Succesor in Interest to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Lowry et al
as 4:2010cv00062
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. as Succesor in Interest to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Edwin Leon Lowry, Jr., Darlene Owens Lowry, Daryl E. Gordy and others
Sampson v. Washington Mutual Bank et al
as 1:2010cv00627
Plaintiff:
Rodney D. Sampson
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
