Cases 61 - 70 of 89
Mace v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Jay Mace
Defendant:
SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. and SunTrust Bank
Clausell v. All The World et al
as 1:2011cv01240
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Clausell
Defendant:
All The World, Jane Does, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Handy v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01210
Plaintiff:
Toyette Handy
Defendant:
Suntrust Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Harris et al v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01112
Plaintiff:
Pam Harris and Robert P. May
Defendant:
Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. and McCalla Raymer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Taylor et al v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01042
Plaintiff:
Shawn Taylor and Yvonne Taylor
Defendant:
SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.
Movant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Childs v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00009
Plaintiff:
Kim Childs
Defendant:
Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. and McCalla and Raymer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Wright v. SouthStar Funding LLC et al
as 1:2010cv03570
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wright
Defendant:
SouthStar Funding LLC, Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. and SunTrust Mortgage Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Fernandez v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
as 1:2010cv03568
Plaintiff:
Adelso Fernandez
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc., Shapiro & Swertfeger, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Hassan v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03553
Plaintiff:
Na'im Hassan
Defendant:
Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. and McCalla Raymer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Alexis v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03482
Plaintiff:
Derek Alexis
Defendant:
SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. and Johnson & Freedman, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
