Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Perez v. Thomas Freight Lines, LLC
as 4:2015cv00244
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Thomas Freight Lines, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 33105
Perez v. D&D Autow's Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04228
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
D&D Autow's Inc., Khosrow Daneshgari and Leslie Zotti
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Perez v. Antico Foods, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03334
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Antico Foods, LLC and Giovanni Dipalma
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 217
Perez v. Sanchez et al
as 1:2015cv02388
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Rik Sanchez, ANTS Software, Inc. and ANTS Software, Inc. 401(K) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Perez v. JEA Architects, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00520
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
JEA Architects, Inc., Joel E. Aycock and JEA Architects, Inc. Simple IRA Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Perez v. Preston et al
as 1:2014cv04122
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Robert N. Preston, TPP Holdings, Inc. and TPP Holdings Inc., Employee Stock Ownership Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Perez v. Johns et al
as 1:2014cv04003
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Bryan M. Johns and Rainwire Partners, Inc. 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Perez et al v. Antico Foods, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv03143
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Antico Foods, LLC and Giovanni Dipalma
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 217
Perez et al v. GBS Installers, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02260
Plaintiff:
Vicente Perez , Ezequiel Martinez and Fredy Zuniga
Defendant:
GBS Installers, Inc. , United Enterprises, Inc. , Geraldine Ruis and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Perez v. Deininger et al
as 1:2014cv01413
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Mark A. Deininger, Arthur A. Horning, James H. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
