Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Grinage v. Pine Street Mortgage et al
as 1:2011cv02493
Plaintiff:
Kita Grinage
Defendant:
Pine Street Mortgage, MERS , EMC Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mitchell et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 1:2011cv02132
Plaintiff:
Gregory Mitchell and Kimberly Mitchell
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA , Bank of America, NA , LaSalle Bank, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gichege v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02141
Plaintiff:
Johnson Gichege
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc. , IBM Lender Business Process Services, Inc. , JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lucas v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
as 3:2010cv00165
Plaintiff:
William J. Lucas
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bordea v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 1:2010cv00542
Plaintiff:
Ana Bordea
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Madzimoyo v. The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. et al
as 1:2009cv02355
Plaintiff:
Wekesa O Madzimoyo
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, GMAC Mortgage, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Gibbs v. Irwin Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00840
Plaintiff:
Lynn Jewel Gibbs
Defendant:
Irwin Mortgage Corporation, Irwin Mortgage Corporation, Chase Home Finance, LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC and JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Counter Defendant:
Lynn Jewel Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gibbs v. Irwin Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2009mi00120
Plaintiff:
Lynn Jewel Gibbs
Defendant:
Irwin Mortgage Corporation, Chase Home Finance, LLC, JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
