Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Brant v. Cooper
as 1:2023cv05893
Plaintiff:
Wendy Bibace Brant
Defendant:
Julie Anne Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Robinson v. 84 Lumber Company, Limited Partnership et al
as 1:2023cv00971
Plaintiff:
Brant Robinson
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, Limited Partnership, ABC Corps. 1-2 and John Doe Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Barber et al v. Snow et al
as 1:2022cv05094
Plaintiff:
Norman Barber and Brant Barber
Defendant:
Michael Snow and Angela Snow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Koenig Healthcare Edmond PLLC et al v. Peyroux et al
as 1:2017cv00384
Plaintiff:
Koenig Healthcare Edmond PLLC and Brant T Koenig
Defendant:
Steven Douglas Peyroux, Robert H Harvey and Physicians Billing System LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allinial Global, Inc. v. Berkowitz, Pollack, Brandt Advisors and Accountants, LLP
as 1:2016cv04098
Plaintiff:
Allinial Global, Inc.
Defendant:
Berkowitz, Pollack, Brant Advisors and Accountants, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
West et al v. ScanTech Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01768
Plaintiff:
Mark D. West , William J. Stout , Jacob S. Pilgrim and others
Defendant:
ScanTech Holdings, LLC, ScanTech Security, LLC, SIBS Investor, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Teets v. DeRyke
as 1:2010cv04105
Plaintiff:
Brant Teets
Defendant:
Henry Steven DeRyke
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DeRyke v. Teets
as 1:2010cv04104
Plaintiff:
Henry Steven DeRyke
Defendant:
Brant Teets
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bake One, Inc. v. Mare et al
as 1:2010cv01046
Defendant:
Virginia (Ginny) L. Mare, Dawn Thomas, Greig L. Mare and others
Plaintiff:
Bake One, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
