Cases 61 - 70 of 480
Groze v. Lester et al
as 1:2022cv01195
Plaintiff:
Jason Groze
Defendant:
Richard M Lester, Joseph Lester and Richard M. Lester, ALC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Podroykin v Christie Business Holdings Company PC
as 2:2022cv02117
Plaintiff:
Artur Podroykin
Defendant:
Christie Business Holdings Company PC doing business as Christie Clinic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dwyer v. Walmart, Inc.
as 3:2022cv03088
Plaintiff:
Laura Dwyer
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Newton v. Wulf
as 4:2022cv04088
Plaintiff:
Kayle Newton
Defendant:
Stephen Wulf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Whitman v. Bumble Trading L.L.C.
as 2:2022cv02100
Plaintiff:
Joshua Whitman
Defendant:
Bumble Trading L.L.C. and Bumble Trading LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Conrad v. Walmart Inc
as 2:2022cv02093
Plaintiff:
Rita Conrad
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kaminski v. Menard Inc
as 2:2022cv02086
Plaintiff:
Mikolaj Kaminski
Defendant:
Menard Inc a foreign corporation doing business as Menards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Notice of Removal
Strode v. Christie Business Holdings Company PC
as 2:2022cv02081
Plaintiff:
Michele L. Strode, Michele L Strode and Artur Podroykin
Defendant:
Christie Business Holdings Company, P.C., (d/b/a "Christie Clinic") and Christie Business Holdings Company PC doing business as Christie Clinic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clow v. The SYGMA Network Inc
as 1:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
William J Clow
Defendant:
The SYGMA Network, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Iseton v. Evonik Corporation
as 1:2022cv01057
Plaintiff:
Michael Iseton
Defendant:
Evonik Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
