Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Parks v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02252
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
William Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Abiomed, Inc.
as 3:2019cv03051
Interested Party:
Memorial Medical Center and William G Pyle
Plaintiff:
Jack Moore
Defendant:
Abiomed, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Pratt Industries Inc et al
as 2:2019cv02011
Defendant:
Barry J Sullivan, Pratt Industries Inc and Pratt Industries USA Inc
Plaintiff:
George Williams and Gerald Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Hollister et al
as 2:2018cv02235
Defendant:
Michael Hollister and TTI Inc
Plaintiff:
Donna Williams and Tara Beckman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2018cv03210
Plaintiff:
Steven Williams
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK), Amtrak and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bullimore v. Nickel Express Inc et al
as 2:2018cv02191
Defendant:
Chris Robert Demos, Thomas William Paddock, Nickel Express Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Mark E Bullimore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brookshier v. Vanbeek et al
as 3:2016cv03311
Plaintiff:
Brenda Brookshier
Defendant:
William Vanbeek and Select Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenney v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2015cv01380
Plaintiff:
William J Kenney
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Nieman et al
as 2:2014cv02088
Plaintiff:
Ambriah Williams
Defendant:
Janice Nieman and Affirmative Insurance Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01570
Plaintiff:
Brenda L Thomas and William R Thomas
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation and Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
