Cases 91 - 100 of 129
Davis v. City of Bloomington/County of McLean et al
as 1:2014cv01205
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Theadore Davis
Defendant:
City of Bloomington/County of McLean, David N. Rumley and Jennifer L. Pazzon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Danville Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv02079
Plaintiff:
Theodore Hill
Defendant:
Danville Police Department, Scott Crawley and City of Danville Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Owens et al
as 2:2014cv02026
Plaintiff:
Ira Lee, III
Defendant:
James A Owens, Justin B Gray, City of Decatur Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Sims et al
as 3:2013cv03421
Plaintiff:
Clyde Wallace Bey
Defendant:
Ryan Sims, Jamiela Kassem, Dahlcamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. City of Peoria et al
as 1:2013cv01559
Plaintiff:
William A Malone
Defendant:
City of Peoria, Steven Smith, Mike McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Walsh et al
as 2:2013cv02153
Plaintiff:
David W Howell
Defendant:
Dan Walsh, Carol Ammons, Julia Rietz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonk v. City of Pekin
as 1:2013cv01191
Plaintiff:
Wade R Bonk
Defendant:
City of Pekin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villarreal v. Doe et al
as 1:2013cv01097
Plaintiff:
Juan Villarreal
Defendant:
John Doe, City Of Bloomington/Bloomington Police Department, Troy L Daugherty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shue v. City of Pekin Illinois et al
as 1:2013cv01086
Plaintiff:
Franklin Shue
Defendant:
City of Pekin Illinois, Pekin Police Department and Danielle Keen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Godinez et al
as 1:2012cv01287
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Griffin
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Marcus Hardy, Richard Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
