Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Lee v. Quinn et al
as 3:2013cv03321
Plaintiff: Abraham Sigurd Lee
Defendant: Pat Quinn, S A Godinez, Michael O'Leary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Chandler
as 4:2013cv04066
Petitioner: Scott F English
Respondent: Nedra Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Hamill et al
as 1:2013cv01243
Plaintiff: Christopher Harris
Defendant: S Hamill, M Schott, Nedra Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGuire v. Chandler
as 1:2013cv01174
Petitioner: Ricky L McGuire
Respondent: Nedra Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chandler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2012cv02297
Plaintiff: Earl C Chandler
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Henderson v. Chandler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01458
Petitioner: Michael Henderson
Respondent: Nedra R Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Chandler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02265
Petitioner: Anthony Craig Young
Respondent: Nedra R Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rash v. Wexford Medical Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv02154
Plaintiff: William Rash
Defendant: Wexford Medical Corporation, Carter, Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shull v. Chandler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv04033
Petitioner: Clifford W Shull
Respondent: Nedra Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. Taylor et al
as 3:2010cv03290
Plaintiff: Mychal Thompson
Defendant: Gladyse Taylor and Nedra Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?