Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Coleman v. Mail Room Supervisor et al
as 4:2016cv04283
Plaintiff:
Dwaine Coleman
Defendant:
Mail Room Supervisor, Stephanie Dorethy, Mark Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Anderson et al
as 1:2016cv01104
Plaintiff:
Dearold K. White
Defendant:
Terri Anderson, John Baldwin, S.A. Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Mail Room Supervisor et al
as 1:2016cv01072
Plaintiff:
Dwaine Coleman
Defendant:
Mail Room Supervisor, Becky Last Name Unknown, Mark Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fathauer v. Kayira et al
as 3:2015cv03250
Plaintiff:
Lynn A Fathauer
Defendant:
. Kayira, . DeWitt, . Qualls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vandervelde v. Van Wolveleare et al
as 4:2014cv04042
Plaintiff:
Christian Vandervelde
Defendant:
Todd Van Wolveleare, Lieutenant Enloe, Terry Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Department of Human Services of the State of Illinois et al
as 2:2013cv02212
Plaintiff:
David W Howell
Defendant:
Department of Human Services of the State of Illinois, State of Illinois, Director of DHS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Hines et al
as 2:2013cv02211
Plaintiff:
David W Howell
Defendant:
Lisa K Hines, Alex O'Brien, James Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Malon Norfleet et al
as 2:2013cv02213
Plaintiff:
David W Howell
Defendant:
Malon Norfleet, Malon Norfleet Supervisor, MacFarland MHC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Fister et al
as 1:2013cv01234
Plaintiff:
Mason Williams
Defendant:
Randy Fister, Mail Supervisor and S A Godinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Russell et al
as 1:2013cv01176
Plaintiff:
Reginald Smith
Defendant:
Robert T Russell, John McGlosson, Sharon Durham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
