Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv04203
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nicholl v. Patibandla et al
as 1:2016cv01361
Plaintiff:
Bernard Nicholl
Defendant:
Sreehari Patibandla, Carla Greby, Greg Gossett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Sangamon County Jail
as 3:2016cv03059
Plaintiff:
Caleb Nichols
Defendant:
Sangamon County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lock et al
as 3:2016cv03011
Plaintiff:
Tameka Nichole Leonia Brown
Defendant:
Angela Lock, George Duncan, Gladyse C. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lock et al
as 3:2015cv03348
Plaintiff:
Tameka Nichole Leonia Brown
Defendant:
Angela Lock, George Duncan, Gladyse C Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2014cv04055
Plaintiff:
Megan Nichole White
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nichols v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv02151
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Nichols
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, State of Illinois, Dr Talbot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03407
Plaintiff:
Dawn Nichols and Shawn Nichols
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, CL Medical Inc and Urpolasty Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols v. Panera Bread Company et al
as 3:2013cv03199
Plaintiff:
Susan R Nichols
Defendant:
Panera Bread Company , ARAMARK Uniform Services (Midwest), LLC and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Notice of Removal
Nichols v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv03178
Petitioner:
James A Nichols
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
