Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Before Judge Matthew Kennelly
Cases 1 - 10 of 568
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund et al v. D.E.S. Painting, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02035
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Deferred Savings Fund and others
Defendant: D.E.S. Painting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the Line Construction Benefit Fund v. VM Tree Service, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Line Construction Benefit Fund
Defendant: VM TREES SERVICE, INC. and VM Tree Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund et al v. American Paving Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00852
Plaintiff: Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund and Charles A Whobrey
Defendant: American Paving Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Iron Workers' Mid-America Pension Plan et al v. Glass Management Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00552
Plaintiff: Iron Workers' Mid-America Pension Plan, Iron Workers' Mid-America Supplemental Monthly Annuity (SMA) Fund and Paul E. Flasch
Defendant: Glass Management Services, Inc. and Ernest Edwards
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Welfare and Pension Funds v. R.P.E. Trucking, Inc., a dissolved Illinois corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv16608
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Welfare and Pension Funds
Defendant: R.P.E. Trucking, Inc., a dissolved Illinois corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers District Council Pension Fund et al v. Pan American Construction Company, Inc.
as 1:2023cv15355
Plaintiff: Chicago & Vicinity Laborers District Council Pension Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers District Council Welfare Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Retiree Health & Welfare Fund and others
Defendant: Pan American Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Fox Valley & Vicinity Construction Workers Welfare Fund et al v. Aztec Cement Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08862
Plaintiff: Fox Valley & Vicinity Construction Workers Welfare Fund, Fox Valley & Vicinity Construction Workers Pension Fund and Lake County, Illinois, Plasterers & Cement Masons Retirement Savings Fund
Defendant: Aztec Cement Company, Inc. and Jorge Torrez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jones v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv06382
Plaintiff: Shonaree Jones
Defendant: The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Pension Fund et al v. Misfits Construction Company
as 1:2023cv05804
Plaintiff: Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Pension Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Welfare Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Retiree Health & Welfare Fund and others
Defendant: MISFITS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council Pension Fund et al v. Palladium Management
as 1:2023cv05198
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council Pension Fund, Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council Welfare Fund, Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council Supplemental Retirement Fund and others
Defendant: Palladium Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?