General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Amaya v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv03828
Petitioner: Daniel Amaya
Respondent: Chance Jones, Latoya Hughes and Kwame Raoulm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Al Momani v. Monti et al
as 1:2024cv00452
Petitioner: Baha'Eddin Al Momani
Respondent: Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Monti et al
as 1:2023cv16541
Petitioner: Michael Curry
Respondent: Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pancratz v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board et al
as 1:2023cv01773
Petitioner: James Pancratz
Respondent: Illinois Prisoner Review Board, Edith Cripler, Leann Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hardy v. Monti et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02978
Petitioner: Chad Harpy and Chad Hardy
Respondent: Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reliford v. Monti et al
as 1:2022cv02894
Petitioner: Timothy Reliford
Respondent: Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krueger v. Monti
as 1:2022cv02201
Petitioner: George Krueger, Jr
Respondent: Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hodges v. Monti
as 1:2021cv03392
Respondent: Illinois Department of Corrections and Daniel Monti
Petitioner: Jason Bruce Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ushery, Jr. v. Ciolli
as 3:2021cv50100
Petitioner: Daniel L. Ushery, Jr.
Defendant: C. Rivers
Respondent: Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ushery, Jr. v. Ciolli
as 3:2021cv50074
Petitioner: Daniel L. Ushery, Jr.
Respondent: C. Rivers and Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?