Cases 51 - 60 of 785
Cowan Hamada
as 1:2023cv15404
Plaintiff:
Regional Director Angie Cowan Hamada
Respondent:
Starbucks Corporation
Corrie et al v. PowerAI Construction Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv50377
Defendant:
PowerAI Construction Inc., Smarter Home Technology Illinois Inc. and Travis Carter
Plaintiff:
Robert Corrie, Corey Riechman and Wes Grider
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stuck v. Dot Foods, Inc.
as 1:2023cv07993
Plaintiff:
Max Stuck, individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals and Max Stuck
Defendant:
Dot Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Embrey v. St. Charles Trading, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv15232
Plaintiff:
Jason Embrey
Defendant:
St. Charles Trading, Inc and Carol Lynn McNally
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Franklin v. IH Services, Inc.
as 1:2023cv15246
Plaintiff:
Dmarco Franklin
Defendant:
IH Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Sopczak v. The Floor 4U.com, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv15231
Plaintiff:
Jamie Sopczak
Defendant:
The Floor 4U.com, LLC and Matthew Pehr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Lambert v. Per Se Group, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02501
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lambert
Defendant:
Per Se Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bobo et al v. Sentech Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05639
Plaintiff:
Michael Bobo and Johnny Parker
Defendant:
Sentech Services, Inc. and United Parcel Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Reusch, Jr v. The Hertz Corporation
as 1:2023cv05490
Plaintiff:
George Reusch, Jr
Defendant:
The Hertz Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Gomez v. Gads Hill Center
as 1:2023cv05233
Plaintiff:
Karina Gomez
Defendant:
Gads Hill Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.