Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Rock Capital Markets, LLC v. Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency et al
as 1:2015cv08859
Plaintiff:
Rock Capital Markets, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency, BMO Capital Markets Corp., BNP Paribas Securities Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Einspahr v. Groupon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02547
Plaintiff:
Dennis Einspahr
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc. , Jason E. Child , Joseph M. Del Preto and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
City Of Chicago et al v. Citigroup, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01814
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. , Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City Of Chicago , State Of Illinois and Tino Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clancy-Gernon Funeral Homes, Inc. et al v. I.F.D.A. Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01293
Plaintiff:
Clancy-Gernon Funeral Homes, Inc. , Aaron Todd Dean d/b/a Bass Patton Dean Funeral Home and Toberman-Dean Funeral Homes , Fred C. Dames Funeral Homes, Inc. and others
Defendant:
I.F.D.A. Services, Inc., Mark K. Cullen , Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Davis et al v. Kozlowski et al
as 1:2007cv00227
Plaintiff:
Scott Davis, Scott Davis, Jay Korach and others
Defendant:
Dennis Kozlowski, Mark H. Swartz, Mark A. Belnick and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Jaffe v. Household Intl Inc, et al
as 1:2002cv05893
Plaintiff:
Glickenhaus Institutional Group, Lawrence E Jaffe and Glickenhaus Inst Grp
Special Master:
Phillip S. Stenger
Defendant:
Household International Inc., Arthur Andersen, L.L.P., W F Aldinger and others
Respondent:
Carl A. LaSusa and Wells Fargo & Company
Petitioner:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc, State of Vermont and Kevin McDonald
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.