Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sensenig v. Nestle USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv50022
Plaintiff:
Marsha Sensenig
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc., Merrick Pet Care and Nestle Purina Pet Care Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brandeis University et al v. Nestle USA, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01513
Plaintiff:
Brandeis University and GFA Brands, Inc.
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Brandeis University et al v. East Side Ovens, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01508
Plaintiff:
Brandeis University and GFA Brands, Inc.
Defendant:
East Side Ovens, Inc. , Voortman Cookies Ltd. , Cookie Specialties, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Voortman Cookies Ltd. , The Pillsbury Company, LLC , Conopco, Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
Voortman Cookies Ltd. , Brandeis University and GFA Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Austin v. Nestle USA, Inc.
as 1:2010cv01105
Plaintiff:
Brandy Austin
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Petitioner:
International Formula Council, International Formula Council and Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
