Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Langel et al v. 3M Company
as 1:2017cv00431
Plaintiff:
Arlene Langel and Michael Langel
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2016cv01215
Plaintiff:
Larry Young
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McAffry et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2015cv10927
Plaintiff:
Michael Kevin McAffry and Susan Audrey McAffry
Defendant:
3M Company , The Boeing Company, Crown Cork & Seal Company and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc. , 3M Company, Crown Cork & Seal Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jindrich v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2015cv08692
Plaintiff:
James Jindrich
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Heathcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Seehafer v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv08561
Petitioner:
Roger W Seehafer
Defendant:
3M Company, CBS Corporation, Cincinnati Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Rodriguez v. 3M Company
as 1:2013cv06695
Defendant:
3M Company
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dr. G. Neil Garrett, DDS, PC v. Ninos Lazar, d/b/a Select Dental, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv06077
Plaintiff:
G. Neil Garrett
Defendant:
Ninos Lazar, 3M Company, Biomet 3I, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Morelli v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2011cv08045
Plaintiff:
Richard J Morelli
Defendant:
3M Company, Airgas Merchant Gases LLC, Bucyrys International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
3M Company, et al vs. William L. Ding
as 1:2011cv08016
Plaintiff:
3M Company , 3M Purification, Inc. and 3M Innovative Properties Company
Defendant:
William L Ding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
