Cases 21 - 30 of 931
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Wooten et al v. Unlimited Carrier, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01568
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wooten and Paul White
Defendant:
Unlimited Carrier, Inc., Trans Quality, Inc., Es Express Lines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Prokhorov v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01375
Plaintiff:
Andrey Prokhorov
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Nancong, Nitrip and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
White v. LOreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01135
Plaintiff:
Mary White
Defendant:
LOreal USA, Inc., LOreal USA Products, Inc. and SoftSheen-Carson, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
