Cases 61 - 70 of 2,131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jones v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Beverly J. Jones
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. and Softsheen-Carson LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv50441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jones v. The Davey Tree Expert Company et al
as 1:2023cv16248
Plaintiff:
Deidre Jones
Defendant:
The Davey Tree Expert Company and Todd Joseph Czernik, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Erwin v. Veradigm Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv16205
Plaintiff:
John M. Erwin
Defendant:
Veradigm Inc., Paul M. Black, Richard J. Poulton and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Gladystine Jones
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. and SoftSheen-Carson LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
