Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Harmet et al v. Medline Industries, Inc et al
as 1:2020cv05605
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HARMET, VANTAGE SPECIALTIES, INC. f/k/a PETROFERM INC, Vantage Specialities, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Steris Isomedix Services, Inc., Medline Industries, Inc, Vantage Specialty Chemicals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SilverSun Industries Inc. v. PPG Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04346
Plaintiff:
SilverSun Industries Inc.
Defendant:
PPG Industries, Inc. and PPG Kansai Automotive Finishes U.S., LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Pete The Painter, Inc. v. PPG Industries, Inc.
as 1:2015cv10916
Plaintiff:
Pete The Painter, Inc.
Defendant:
PPG Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Tate et al v. The Sherwin-Williams Company et al
as 1:2015cv02900
Plaintiff:
Raymond Tate and Beulah Tate
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company , BASF Corporation , E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
National Painting, Inc. v. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv08054
Plaintiff:
National Painting, Inc.
Defendant:
PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc. and PPG Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. American Gage & Machine Co., et al
as 1:2011cv04791
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
American Gage & Machine Co., Brightly Galvanized Products, Inc., Chamberlain Manufacturing Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
