Cases 41 - 50 of 1,899
Henderson v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Emmanuel L. Henderson
Respondent:
David Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Corbin v. Warden
as 3:2023cv03867
Petitioner:
Ronald E Corbin
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Northern District of Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv03856
Petitioner:
Jerome R. Johnson
Respondent:
Northern District of Illinois and J. B. Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz v. F.C.I. Greenville et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Jessie Nichole Cruz
Respondent:
F.C.I. Greenville and T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Condon v. Wills
as 3:2023cv03747
Petitioner:
Andrew Condon
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv03793
Petitioner:
Carlos Manuel Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McDuffie v. Rock Island County
as 3:2023cv03960
Petitioner:
Yolanduis L. McDuffie
Respondent:
Rock Island County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Stempenski
as 3:2023cv03617
Petitioner:
Christopher Parker
Respondent:
Rich Stempenski and Warden Darren Galloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mannering v. Lillard
as 3:2023cv03666
Petitioner:
Matthew Robert Mannering
Respondent:
Thomas Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gardner v. Brookhart
as 3:2023cv03231
Petitioner:
DeShawn Gardner
Respondent:
Deanna M. Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
