Cases 11 - 20 of 3,416
Parker v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Parker
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Unknown IDOC Directors, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Demetrius H. Nichols
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Dr. Garcia, K Osmundon and others
Petitioner:
Jeffrey J. Neslund and Michael D. Robbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Johnson
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills, Nurse Crane, Nurse Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01285
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01288
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flakes v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Thomas Flakes
Defendant:
David W. Mitchell, Michael T. Bailey, Brandon Ridgeway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and David Michell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Shan Crump
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01232
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Officer Baker and Lance Korando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Gary
as 3:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
Walter D. Boyd, III
Defendant:
Deputy Gary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
