Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Ike v. Sadler
as 3:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Larry Ike, Jr
Defendant:
Bradley T Sadler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Rowland et al
as 3:2023cv03300
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
Major Rowland, Lt. Zang, Bradley Sadler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Pelt v. Uraski et al
as 3:2023cv02089
Plaintiff:
Ronald M Van Pelt
Defendant:
Jon M. Uraski, Charles W. Heck and Bradley A. Kirkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv00912
Plaintiff:
Eazs A. Harper
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills, Frank Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorn v. Jefferys et al
as 3:2022cv02378
Plaintiff:
James Dorn
Defendant:
Rob Jefferys, Lisa Weitekamp, David W. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amaya v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2021cv01707
Plaintiff:
Daniel Amaya
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Scott Thompson, Jeffrey M. Dennison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McReaken et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00584
Defendant:
Derek Cleland, Illinois Department of Corrections, Luke Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Toliver and Scott McReaken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tuduj v. Boswell Pharmacy Services LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00924
Defendant:
Boswell Pharmacy Services LLC, Wexford Health Source Inc., T. Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Tom Tuduj
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Due v. Bataillon et al
as 3:2020cv00279
Defendant:
Bataillon, Richard G. Koph, Matthew R. Hoffman and others
Plaintiff:
Due and Randall David Due
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bradley v. Wexford, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00752
Plaintiff:
Deandre Bradley
Defendant:
Ron Skidmore, Wexford, Inc., John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
