Cases 1 - 10 of 14
White v. United States of America, et al.
as 3:2018cv01682
Defendant:
Unknown Mailroom Employees, George, Metzger and others
Plaintiff:
William A. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Ajaj v. United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv01245
Plaintiff:
Ahmad M Ajaj
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, Wendy J Roal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Ramirez v. Fleming
as 3:2014cv00599
Plaintiff:
Salvador Cuellar Ramirez
Defendant:
Dr Kruse and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gomez v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00946
Plaintiff:
Ismael Gomez, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dickerson v. China et al
as 3:2013cv00498
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Dickerson, Jr
Defendant:
China, Japan, Pat Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00307
Plaintiff:
Gerald Hill
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Gregory Lee McCall v. United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv00843
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee McCall
Defendant:
United States of America and P A Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv00161
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fasullo v. People of the United States of America et al
as 3:2008cv00583
Plaintiff:
Louis Fasullo
Defendant:
People of the United States of America, Central Intelligence Agency and Federal Communication Commission
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Buechel v. United States of America et al
as 3:2008cv00132
Plaintiff:
Joseph W Buechel
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
