Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Gibbs v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2008cv00355
Plaintiff:
David P. Gibbs
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kirby v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2008cv00229
Plaintiff:
William Patrick Kirby
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allgier v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2008cv00226
Plaintiff:
Ryan Allgier
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daugherty v. Western-Cullen Hayes, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2007cv00745
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Daugherty
Defendant:
Western-Cullen Hayes, Inc.
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Western-Cullen Hayes, Inc.
ThirdParty Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Bunnell v. Union Pacific Railroad et al
as 3:2007cv00686
Plaintiff:
William James Bunnell
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Kopaskey v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2007cv00479
Plaintiff:
Bruce W. Kopaskey
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.