Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Nelson v. US Marshals Service
as 3:2010cv00884
Petitioner:
James C. Nelson
Respondent:
US Marshals Service and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collier v. U S Marshals Service et al
as 3:2010cv00888
Petitioner:
Artimus A. Collier
Respondent:
U S Marshals Service and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Dental Care Department et al
as 3:2010cv00874
Plaintiff:
David Brent Anderson
Defendant:
Dental Care Department, Dr Chapman, David Rednour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Evans et al
as 3:2010cv00873
Petitioner:
Marshall McDaniel
Respondent:
John Evans and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reeves v. Rednour et al
as 3:2010cv00869
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Reeves
Respondent:
David Rednour and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dinwiddie v. Evans et al
as 3:2010cv00675
Petitioner:
Steve Dinwiddie
Respondent:
John Evans and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pattison v. Hulett et al
as 3:2010cv00625
Petitioner:
Debra Sue Pattison
Respondent:
Melody Hulett and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ursery v. Gates et al
as 3:2010cv00537
Petitioner:
Fernandez Ursery
Respondent:
Donales Gates and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blake v. Hardy et al
as 3:2010cv00238
Petitioner:
Samuel Paul Blake
Respondent:
Marcus Hardy and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Birkey et al
as 3:2010cv00231
Petitioner:
Anthony S Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Birkey, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, Attorney General of the State of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
