Cases 1 - 10 of 28
McKinney et al v. Diversified Machine Bristol LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00504
Plaintiff:
Don McKinney and Sonya Brantley
Defendant:
Diversified Machine Bristol LLC , Chassix Inc and XYZ Entities 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Bogota v. Dometic Corporation
as 3:2016cv00446
Plaintiff:
Giberto Bogota
Defendant:
Dometic Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Forest River Inc
as 3:2015cv00152
Plaintiff:
James Rogers
Defendant:
Forest River Inc and Quincy L/N/U
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vavrek et al v. International Union United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America et al
as 3:2014cv01903
Plaintiff:
Terrie Vavrek , Angela Tolley , Linda Ragsdale and others
Defendant:
International Union United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and UAW Local #5
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Sahlhoff v. Gurley-Leep Automotive Management Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv01790
Plaintiff:
Jacob Sahlhoff
Defendant:
Gurley-Leep Automotive Management Corporation and Gurley-Leep Buick-GMC Truck Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Irelan v. Walmart Inc
as 3:2014cv01576
Plaintiff:
Dialene Irelan
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McLaurin et al v. Gary City of
as 3:2013cv01132
Plaintiff:
Juana D McLaurin , Sonji Draper , Charlotte Thompson and others
Defendant:
Gary City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lavengood v. Plymouth Tube Company USA
as 3:2013cv00618
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lavengood
Defendant:
Plymouth Tube Company USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lace v. Fortis Plastics LLC
as 3:2012cv00363
Plaintiff:
Henry Lace
Defendant:
Fortis Plastics LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Young v. Fortis Plastics LLC
as 3:2012cv00364
Plaintiff:
Jim Young
Defendant:
Fortis Plastics LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
