Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Rounds et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC
as 1:2018cv00252
Defendant:
Coloplast A/S, Porges S.A., Endo Health Solutions Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gregg Rounds and Joyce Rounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barkley v. Medical Depot, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00208
Defendant:
Airway Oxygen and Medical Depot, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jared Barkley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Durham v. Wonderful Pistachios & Almonds LLC
as 1:2018cv00034
Plaintiff:
John D Durham
Defendant:
Wonderful Pistachios & Almonds LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ridgley et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Ridgley, Melissa Ridgley and Eric Ridgley
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc, Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Melendres v. Officine Facco & C.S.P.A. et al
as 1:2017cv00442
Plaintiff:
Juan Gabriel Melendres and Ana Gomez Nolasco
Defendant:
Officine Facco & C.S.P.A. and Facco USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oloyede et al v. Shergill Trans, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00092
Plaintiff:
Abayomi Oloyede , Leatha Oloyede , Afolabi Ajayi and others
Defendant:
Rupinder Singh and Shergill Trans., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bednarski et al v. Lumbar Liquidators, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Peter Bednarski , KB 1 and KB 2
Defendant:
Lumbar Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Giesler v. KT-Grant, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00364
Plaintiff:
Scott R Giesler
Defendant:
KT-Grant Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watkins v. Metso Minerals Industries, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
William Watkins
Defendant:
Metso Minerals Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nitz et al v. Dream Products Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00341
Plaintiff:
Annette Nitz and Michael Nitz
Defendant:
Dream Products Inc , PPR Direct Marketing, LLC and Windtel International Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
