Cases 21 - 30 of 3,830
Williams v. RentGrow, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Dominique Williams
Defendant:
RentGrow, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Indiana State of v. Express Scripts Administrators et al
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA and Indiana State of
Defendant:
Express Scripts Administrators, LLC d/b/a Express Scripts, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Novo Nordisk, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Hammond City of et al v. ASARCO Master Inc
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
City of Hammond, Indiana, City of Whiting, Indiana, Hammond City of and others
Defendant:
ASARCO MASTER, INC. and ASARCO Master Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6972 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Britton v. South Bend City of
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
William R. Britton
Defendant:
City of South Bend and South Bend City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Peck v. Nelson et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Marcus LaShawn Peck
Defendant:
William J Nelson and Marion County Prosecutor's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
