Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Hudson v. ArcelorMittal LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
Todd Hudson
Defendant:
Arcelormittal Burns Harbor LLC , ArcelorMittal, LLC, ArcelorMittal USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. NorthShore Health Center et al
as 2:2014cv00472
Plaintiff:
Chanel Johnson
Defendant:
NorthShore Health Center , Nadine P Burns , Health Care Defendant No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Timothy Hodum v. Mittal Steel USA Inc
as 2:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Hodum
Defendant:
Mittal Steel USA Inc and ARCELOR MITTAL BURNS HARBOR LLC improperly sued as MITTAL STEEL USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Letson v. Arcelormittal Burns Harbor LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00449
Plaintiff:
Antoniette Letson
Defendant:
Arcelormittal Burns Harbor LLC and Unknown Employees of Arcelormittal Burns Harbor LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00524
Plaintiff:
Lee Burns and Patricia Williams-Burns
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet US Reconstruction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackman v. Arcelormittal USA LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00239
Plaintiff:
Randall K Jackman
Defendant:
Arcelormittal USA LLC and Arcelormittal Burns Harbor LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kurth et al v. Arcelormittal USA Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00108
Plaintiff:
Ron Kurth, Ron Kurth, Ron Kurth and others
Defendant:
Arcelormittal USA Inc, Arcelormittal Burns Harbor LLC, Dover Chemical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Van Swol et al v. ISG Burns Harbor LLC et al
as 2:2007cv00096
Plaintiff:
Darryl Van Swol, Darryl Van Swol, Jan Van Swol and others
Defendant:
ISG Burns Harbor LLC, ISG Burns Harbor LLC, Donald Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
