Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Rebenack v. Menard Inc
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Terry L Rebenack
Defendant:
Menard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Richardson v. Menard Inc
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Joyce A Richardson
Defendant:
Menard Inc doing business as Menards
Other:
Galen Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Reeves et al v. Menard, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Alvin T. Reeves and Alta Lavizzo
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Slayton et al v. Menards
as 3:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Slayton and Ronald Slayton, Jr.
Defendant:
Menard, Inc. d/b/a Menards and Menards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gordon v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
LINDA GORDON
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Tyrone v. Menard Inc
as 2:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
George Tyrone, Jr
Defendant:
Menard Inc
Not Classified By Court:
Galen A Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Berry v. Menard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Berthaline Berry
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Laurant v. Menard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Kevin Laurant
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Whitlock v. Menard, Inc
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Whitlock
Defendant:
Menard, Inc. d/b/a Menards and Menards, Inc. doing business as Menards
3Rd Party Defendant:
ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Neal v. Menard, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Kraig Neal
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
