Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
P.E., a Minor Child, by and through his parents and next friends, Mark English and Becky English v. Preyan et al
as 5:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
P. E.
Defendant:
Jermaine Preyan, Young Money Entertainment, LLC, Cash Money Records, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Bagwell
as 3:2011mc00014
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
William Bryan Bagwell
Tew v. Yahoo, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00200
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Tew
Defendant:
Yahoo, Inc., East Jefferson Hospital, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Tew v. Teamworks USA et al
as 3:2011cv00089
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Tew
Defendant:
Teamworks USA, Special Response Corporation and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Able Fence Co. Profit Sharing Plan et al v. Heartland Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
Able Fence Co. Profit Sharing Plan, Able Fence Co. Profit Sharing Plan, Able Fence Co. Profit Sharing Plan and others
Defendant:
Heartland Resources, Inc., Heartland Holding Company, Inc., Heartland Drilling, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
