Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Aliff et al v. Mayfield Consumer Products, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Dustin Aliff, Roberta Brooks, Jeff Chism and others
Defendant:
Mayfield Consumer Products, LLC, Justin Bobbitt and Lorenzo H. Cash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Johnson et al v. Mayfield Consumer Products, LLC
as 5:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Elijah Johnson, William Aliff, Matthew Barber and others
Defendant:
Mayfield Consumer Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Atkinson et al v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc. I et al
as 3:2015cv00658
Plaintiff:
Angel Atkinson , Kim Aunkst , Etta Avant and others
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. I , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawson et al v. Chuy's Opco, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00227
Plaintiff:
Norma Lawson and Curtis Lawson
Defendant:
Chuy's Opco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lawson v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
Stoney Lawson
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawson et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00812
Plaintiff:
Rebecca L. Lawson and Rick Lawson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lawson v. Yamaha Motor Corporation USA et al
as 3:2009cv00212
Plaintiff:
Carla Lawson, Carla Lawson and Carla Lawson
Defendant:
Yamaha Motor Corporation USA and Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lawson v. Techtronic Industries North America, Inc et al
as 5:2008cv00093
Plaintiff:
Grover Lawson
Defendant:
Techtronic Industries North America, Inc, Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. and Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
