Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Terry v. GoBuryMe, LLC, et al
as 2:2019cv00181
Defendant:
Kevin King, goburyme, LLC, Gregory Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Katherine Terry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Entu Auto Services, Inc. v. PicMyRide.Biz, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Entu Auto Services, Inc.
Defendant:
PicMyRide.Biz, LLC, Aubrey King and Timmy Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc. v. Shah et al
as 2:2012cv02240
Plaintiff:
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.
Defendant:
Samir Shah and One Stop Elite, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc. v. Thornton et al
as 2:2012cv00850
Plaintiff:
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.
Defendant:
Terrance Thornton and Tina Thornton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc. v. Summers
as 2:2012cv00839
Plaintiff:
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Summers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc. v. Khattra et al
as 2:2012cv00609
Plaintiff:
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.
Defendant:
Mandeep Khattra and Jasbir Bains
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc. v. D'Agostino
as 2:2011cv02822
Plaintiff:
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.
Defendant:
Anthony D'Agostino
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc. v. Patel et al
as 2:2011cv02831
Plaintiff:
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.
Defendant:
Tushar Patel, Nirmalkumar Patel and Rachnan Patel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc. v. Delaney Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01569
Plaintiff:
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.
Defendant:
Delaney Group, Inc., Jeffrey McMullen and Margaret McMullen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc. v. J. Clark Downtown, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01550
Defendant:
J. Clark Downtown, LLC and Justin V. Clark
Plaintiff:
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
