Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Sanders et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02884
Plaintiff:
Denise Sanders and Reginald Sanders
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts, Sr. et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv13657
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Roberts, Sr. and Natasha Roberts
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodrigue et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05920
Plaintiff:
Debra P. Rodrigue and Mark A. Rodrigue
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marigny v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01696
Plaintiff:
Karen Marigny
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Naquin et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02821
Plaintiff:
Simon Naquin and Crystal Naquin
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brewton et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01378
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Brewton and Crystal Brewton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LaCorte v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01250
Plaintiff:
William St John LaCorte
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Access Systems, Inc.
Movant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Villemarette v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2009cv03811
Plaintiff:
Peggy Villemarette
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Valence v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2 et al
as 2:2008cv01121
Plaintiff:
Andy Valence
Defendant:
Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2, C.R. Bard, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ivey v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00752
Plaintiff:
Earl Ivey
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
