Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Ussin v. Lethem et al
as 2:2018cv07030
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Luther Lethem and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jasmin Ussin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679 d2
Guichard et al v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2018cv00874
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Guichard and Sabrina Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2401
Rhodes v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2018cv00612
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Fitzgerald et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2017cv08893
Plaintiff:
Gina Fitzgerald and Jeremy Fitzgerald
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Craig v. Merit Systems Protection Board
as 2:2017cv06242
Plaintiff:
Keith Ray Craig
Defendant:
Merit Systems Protection Board and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Woods v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2017cv02972
Plaintiff:
Joyce Woods
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Pugh et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2017cv01907
Plaintiff:
Kynisha Pugh , John Pugh and Patricia Pugh
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Joe Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 0409
Depron v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2017cv01102
Plaintiff:
Ethel Depron
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Calvin Daiz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Newman et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2017cv01104
Plaintiff:
Darnell Newman and Clarence Stokes
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Amber L Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2016mc16726
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
United States Postal Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
