Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Curtis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S Curtis
Defendant:
Becton, Dickinson and Company and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knatt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00315
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrea Knatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richardson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00316
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rubie J Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00801
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Linda M. Taylor
Not Yet Classified:
Angela M. Higgins and John J. Driscoll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Basham v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00781
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vickie Basham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00193
Plaintiff:
Theda Banks
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reed et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00160
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sherita Reed and Stephen Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peterson et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00528
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carol Peterson and Richard Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rice et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00240
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carolyn R Rice and Roy R Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00135
Plaintiff:
Debra S Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
