Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Pine Valley Foods Inc v. International Food Products Corp et al
as 3:2012cv02268
Plaintiff:
Pine Valley Foods Inc
Defendant:
International Food Products Corp, Siemer Milling Co, Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lavespere v. Shop-Vac Corp
as 1:2012cv01960
Plaintiff:
Walt Lavespere
Defendant:
Shop Vac Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
E D I Solutions L L C v. New Pig Corp
as 6:2011cv01237
Plaintiff:
E D I Solutions L L C
Defendant:
New Pig Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cameron Parish Police Jury v. Nelson L C et al
as 2:2011cv00426
Plaintiff:
Police Jury of Cameron Parish
Defendant:
Nelson L C and Mobile Specialties Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lemons et al v. McClains R V Inc et al
as 5:2011cv00118
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lemons and Claudie Lemons
Defendant:
McClains R V Inc and Winnebago Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Southwest Louisiana Hospital Association v. BASF Construction Chemicals, LLC
as 2:2010cv00902
Plaintiff:
Southwest Louisiana Hospital Association
Defendant:
BASF Construction Chemicals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ternium USA, Inc. v. Product Handling Design, Inc.
as 5:2010cv00550
Defendant:
Product Handling Design, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ternium USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Muse Marketing Group, LLC v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv01998
Plaintiff:
Muse Marketing Group, LLC
Defendant:
Ikon Office Solutions, Inc. and Ikon Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Ledoux et al v. General Motors Corp
as 5:2008cv01839
Defendant:
General Motors Corp
Plaintiff:
Jack Ledoux and Carla Ledoux
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dugas v. Smithkline Beecham Corp
as 2:2008cv00465
Plaintiff:
Chester Dugas
Defendant:
Smithkline Beckman Corp
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
