Cases 1 - 10 of 353
Calcasieu Parish Police Jury v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Police Jury of Calcasieu Parish
Defendant:
Indian Harbor Insurance Co, Lexington Insurance Co, Q B E Specialty Insurance Co and others
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Lafitte Investments II L L C v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London et al
as 3:2023cv01771
Plaintiff:
Lafitte Investments II, LLC and Lafitte Investments II L L C
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Aries Marine Corp et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London
as 6:2023cv01503
Plaintiff:
Aries Marine Corporation, U.S. Specialty Insurance Company, Aries Marine Corp and others
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London including those of Syndicate 4444 subscribing to Marine Pollution Policy Section G of Cover Note No. CUL11037.078 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
M K Mall Holdings L L C v. Underwriters at Lloyds of London et al
as 6:2023cv01455
Plaintiff:
MK Mall Holdings, LLC and M K Mall Holdings L L C
Defendant:
Underwriters at Lloyds, of London, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
M D Title L L C v. Watford Insurance Co et al
as 6:2023cv01147
Plaintiff:
M D Title L L C
Defendant:
Watford Insurance Co, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, United Wholesale Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Triple Nickel Fabricators L L C v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Policy No. YNO5234 et al
as 1:2023cv01103
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Plaintiff:
Triple Nickel Fabricators L L C
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Policy No YNO5234, Peninsula Insurance Bureau Inc, TechLoss Consulting & Restoration Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
U S Bank National Association v. Ace American Insurance Co et al
as 5:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the Registered Holders of UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C-2, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C-2, through its Sp and U S Bank National Association
Defendant:
Ace American Insurance Company, Hudson Specialty Insurance Company, Underwriters at Lloyds Syndicate 2987BRT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dore Operating Co L L C v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Policy No B0702GL307060p et al
as 2:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Dore Operating Company, LLC and Dore Operating Co L L C
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. B0702GL307060p, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. B0702GL307061p, Syndicate TRV 5000 at Lloyd's and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Town of Vinton v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London et al
as 2:2023cv00240
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Plaintiff:
Town of Vinton
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Indian Harbor Insurance Co, Q B E Specialty Insurance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0201 Enforcement of foreign arbitral awards
Police Jury of Calcasieu Parish v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Police Jury of Calcasieu Parish
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Indian Harbor Insurance Co, Lexington Insurance Co and others
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
