Cases 61 - 70 of 79
Maureen v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2011cv12530
Plaintiff:
Heikkinen Maureen
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heikkinen v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2011cv12532
Plaintiff:
Maureen Heikkinen
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blaszcak et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2011cv11925
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Blaszcak and Caulette Blaszczak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. The Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2011cv11872
Plaintiff:
Debbie Bryant
Defendant:
The Federal National Mortgage Association and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sobh v. Bank of America, NA et al
as 2:2011cv11295
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Sobh and Sam Sobh
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA , JPMorgan Chase Bank NA , Trott & Trott PC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Johnson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2011cv10247
Plaintiff:
Cateia Johnson
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2011cv10247
Plaintiff:
Cateia Johnson
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fawkes v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2011cv10054
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Randolph Fawkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilkes v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2010cv14236
Plaintiff:
Robert Jerome Wilkes
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Paganes et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2010cv13687
Plaintiff:
John T. Paganes and Elizabeth A. Paganes
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Washington Mutual Bank FA , Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
