Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Pike et al v. Flagstar Bank
as 4:2022cv11642
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pike and Andrew Hawkins
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank
Petitioner:
Philip Angus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HEEG et al v. UNITED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
as 2:2021cv12112
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS HEEG, DALTON PARISH, ANDREW CRAMPTON and others
Defendant:
UNITED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
Feril v. 3G Home Exteriors, Inc., a Michigan corporation et al
as 3:2021cv11406
Defendant:
3G Home Exteriors, Inc., a Michigan corporation and Jacob Heier
Plaintiff:
C.J. Feril and Andrew Miller
Abumchi v. Joak American Homes, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv13286
Defendant:
Dr. Hyacinth Akunne, Carnegie Adult Foster Care, Andrew Akunne and others
Plaintiff:
Destiny Abumchi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KIm et al v. Detroit Medical Informatics, LLC d/b/a DMI
as 2:2019cv11185
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rollins and Andrew KIm
Defendant:
Detroit Medical Informatics, LLC d/b/a DMI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Andrews v. Milenium, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv13286
Plaintiff:
Mario Andrews
Defendant:
Milenium, Inc. , Daniela Herman and Samuel Herman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dowd et al v. DirectTV, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv14018
Plaintiff:
Donald Dowd , Robert Athan , Gary Foster and others
Defendant:
DirectTV, Inc., DirectTV, LLC, Multiband Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Tumpkin v. Andrews Delivery Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv12883
Plaintiff:
Avis Tumpkin
Defendant:
Andrews Delivery Services, Inc. and Alfonzo Andrews
Ramirez v. Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC
as 2:2012cv14480
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ramirez
Defendant:
Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC
Dziengelewski et al v. B & P Process Equipment and Systems, LLC
as 1:2010cv14898
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dziengelewski , Robin Aurs and Richard Steele
Defendant:
B & P Process Equipment and Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
