Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2012md02311
Plaintiff:
A1A Airport & Limousine Service, Inc., AGA Realty LLC, Ifeoma Adams and others
Defendant:
AB SKF, ALPS Electric (North America), Inc., Alps Automotive, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
American Honda Motor Company, Inc., Timmy A. Curtis, Sherman Bearings, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc., Thomas Saris, Jim Sciaroni and others
Petitioner:
Sandra Singer and David Dishman
Respondent:
Hino Motors Manufacturing U.S.A. Inc.
In Re:
Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
Special Master:
Gene J. Esshaki
Intervenor:
Financial Recovery Services, LLC and United States of America
Claimant:
Certain End-Payor Settlement Class Members and Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc.
Back et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11372
Plaintiff:
Duane Roberts, James Flowers, Simon Semonin and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Moriarty et al v. Wynnestone Communities Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv12606
Defendant:
William C Bucher, Eric Van Lustbader, Douglas Allison Trust and others
Plaintiff:
LP Equity 3, LLC, Aubrey Family Trust, Daniel C Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
United States of America v. Bass
as 2:2018mj30262
Defendant:
Anthony Eugene Bass
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Bass
as 2:2018mj30262
Defendant:
Anthony Eugene Bass
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Smith
as 2:2018mc50386
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eugene Cephus Smith
United States of America v. Hill
as 2:2017mj30454
Defendant:
Sean Eugene Hill
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Hill
as 2:2017mj30454
Defendant:
Sean Eugene Hill
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
