Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Pady et al v. US Attorney General et al
as 2:2023cv10425
Plaintiff:
Wadha Kaid Pady and HABIB Radman SALEH
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur M Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LaForge et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2022cv12778
Plaintiff:
Kimberly LaForge and Yassine Marouani
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur M Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mutlaq v. Dedvukaj et al
as 5:2018cv13284
Plaintiff:
Mr Hassan Mutlaq
Defendant:
Detroit Director USC Mirash "Mick" Dedvukaj, FBI Direcor Christopher A. Wray, Secretary DHS Kirstjen Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv10273
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Msallaty et al v. USDHS et al
as 2:2013cv12508
Plaintiff:
Zaher Msallaty and Imad Mezel
Defendant:
USDHS, Robert S Mueller, III, Eric H Holder, Jr and others
Raouf v. Cannon et al
as 2:2013cv11930
Petitioner:
Yakoub Raouf
Respondent:
Michael Cannon, Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv13854
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leica v. Holder et al
as 2:2010cv11932
Plaintiff:
Florentin Leica
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Achour v. Dedvukaj et al
as 2:2010cv11682
Plaintiff:
Naji Achour
Defendant:
Mick Dedvukaj, USDHS, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Tingey v. Dedvukaj et al
as 2:2010cv11227
Plaintiff:
Arthur Robert Tingey
Defendant:
Mick Dedvukaj, Jack Lin, Thomas Brownrigg and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
